Wednesday, 30 April 2008

Nagano Glows Red




Last Saturday it was Nagano’s turn to play host to this year’s controversial Olympic Torch Relay. For the preceding weeks the event had been anticipated with much trepidation. This has mainly been due the city’s famous buddhist temple, Zenkoji, opting to withdraw from festivities on the basis of security and the worsening situation in Tibet. Since temple officials refused to host the relay as a starting point it has been the target of phone calls, vandalism and even death threats. This, plus reports of chinese exchange students organising large scale gatherings in the city, has helped helped ferment a sour preamble to the event. Fearing possible clashes 3000 police had been sent to provide security.

On arriving in the city as the relay set off from its starting point, the station was already thronging with supporters and protesters. But overwhelmingly it was the red flag that was most prominent as the chinese supporters arrived in large groups of Chinese students and ex-pats alike. Many of the supporters where grasping huge bed-sheet sized flags that towered over the groups of people headed for the park. It seemed the Chinese had come well equipped with an array of stickers, banners, flags and t-shirts, some being handed out freely to other supporters. The pro- Tibetan supporters on the other, with the exception of organisations such as Reporters Without Borders seemed mostly to come quite independently and in much smaller groups. As oppose to the Chinese students most Pro- Tibetan protesters came with home-made signs and flags, as many handed out Tibetan flag decorated paper cranes to passers by.

Emboldened by their sheer numbers, many of the Chinese I spoke to (most of whom spoke fairly decent Japanese) were in a boisterous and jovial mood. “We’ve come to support China and promote peace”, a young man told me, “I’m very excited to be here” . The less celebratory, pro-Tibetan protesters in contrast seemed quite passive. This was until I came across a group of roughly one hundred angered protesters marching towards Wakasato park from the station. Though they hadn’t all necessarily come with a completely united purpose, the particular group I came across contained a small but rather vocal contingent of hardline nationalists who openly voiced their resentment to the large Chinese presence in the city. One protester even carried a sign that said in English, “Divide China” followed by “Get Out!” in Japanese. The majority of pro-Tibetan protesters however emphasized the importance of civility.

I approach one middle aged man from Tokyo carrying a sign with a gruesome picture of a bloodied prostate figure reading, in Japanese, “Get out of Tibet!, China is a nation that slaughters it people”. I asked him what his feelings were about the supporters who came and he told me, “We are furious, we have only come here in groups of four or five but all of these Chinese exchange students that have come here in large groups organised by the Chinese embassy. This is Japan. We are enraged. But”, he was quick to add, “there is to be no violence, this is not about violence”. Shortly afterwards, a van full of chinese supporters (waving flags out of there windows) pulled up next to them, chanting in chinese, “China, China, China!”. The man I had been speaking to then engaged the van pointing and shouting into the window followed by other angry protesters. However, uniformed police in dark suits were close on hand to quell the situation and ordered the van to move on. Later as I followed the group towards the park I saw a few scuffles, as a man swathed in the Hinomaru (the flag of Japan) had a push-and-shove scuffle with a group of young Chinese students. Compared to Nagano station, the area approaching the park was heavily guarded, so few encounters were allowed to develop into full blown confrontations. Nearer the station however, an anxious policeman informed me, the fights had come to more serious blows. He seemed slightly nervous.


As I arrived back at Wakasato Park I spoke to a young women, an onlooker from Niigata Prefecture. She told me about her discomfort concerning the large groups of Chinese protesters. “I’m not sure”, she said, “Why do they need to come here in these big groups if not to cause a disturbance?”. Chinese supporters had almost doubled their numbers since earlier that morning as they held the central part of the park, surrounding the stage where the flame was to be lit. The Pro-Tibetan protesters on the other hand had been herded by the police into the southern corner of the park shouting, “Free Tibet!” in English.

As the Chinese crowd in the center became larger, they became louder. This seemed to represent both a rally of support and a nationalist protest. I could not help but notice how rare it was to glimpse a supporter holding an olympic flag. It was clear that the flag of the People’s Republic was holding prominence as portable stereos blared out the Chinese national anthem. The feelings of many people seemed to be summed up as I approached a rain-soaked pro-Tibetan protester departing from the area after the ceremony. “It’ s interesting” he said, “ that the Japanese police kept us Japanese people out and only Chinese people with Chinese flags could get into the centre to see the ceremony. The Japanese people with Tibetan flags couldn’t get close enough to see the flame or the ceremony. I just don’t understand. They seem to think the Olympics are only for the Chinese. I care about the Olympics but I also care the Tibetan people”. As the protesters walked away from the empty park they no longer seemed angry, just saddened.

Friday, 18 April 2008

China’s Convenient War On Terror

Without a doubt the “war on terror” has been America’s greatest contribution to the world in the 21st Century. For the majority of mankind, September 11th and the subsequent crusade that proceeded has been a nightmare. A humanitarian disaster.
However, for many for the callous political elite around the world its has been a great gift. An ideological blank check for the larger nations to consolidate their influence. A veritable vampiric orgy of blood, money and power. This “war on terror” has provided the pretense for wholesale domination and intimidation. Whether it is America with Iraq, Israel with Palestine or Russia with Chechnya, the war against the muslim world has been given a renewed impetus.

The war on terror has now even extended beyond the steppes of central asia all the way to Beijing. In China’s halls of power, politicians are also attaching the bumper-sticker “war on terror” label to age old conflicts in the Xinjiang region. As in many other countries, those who struggle for sovereignty or autonomy are now considered terrorists.
Much like Tibet, Xinjiang previously enjoyed independence and then faced subsequent domination by communist China in years following the second world war. The cynical Chinese communist party has now made the claim that those fighting against the Chinese imperial ambitions in Xinjiang have been aided or supported by Al Qaida. But the truth is that Al Qaida’s rather brief but noisy twenty year history is little comment on a struggle that has persisted for more than a hundred years. The only difference between Tibet and Xinjiang is fact that the latter is a largely Muslim minority, and therefore somehow, not to be given same degree of international attention. Campaigning for a free Tibet is a nobel cause, but to ignore the struggle of the Xinjiang province reveals a grave hypocrisy or possibly even Islamaphobia.

Thursday, 27 March 2008

Beijing Olympics: Successful PR or a Revealing Spotlight?

When Beijing was awarded the Olympics back in 2001 it marked the beginning of a new atmosphere of hope. For the Chinese there is a feeling that a new era is beginning. To the Chinese the Olympics marks a chance to show a strong, progressive, international China to the world. International observers have also felt this hope. Hope that the increased spotlight will put pressure on the communist government to improve human rights in China. Many continue to maintain this faith but recent events have proved such optimism is not necessarily universal.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has recently rejected criticism of their decision to award Beijing the Olympics. IOC commission chief, Giselle David has stated that, "(The Olympics) will allow the world to take a look at Beijing and the wider Chinese society. We see that as positive - and think it will engender a stronger understanding.” Indeed the world has been taking a closer look at Beijing. Yet, some do not feel the there has been enough improvement. What’s more, on the flip-side, such international scrutiny may exacerbate Beijing’s oppressive nature . With increased international focus, the communist regime is even more motivated to silence it's dissenters. In the run up to the games there have been reports of greater stops being put on media freedom and an increase in arrests and forced evictions².

The most contentious issues with the Chinese government in recent months have undoubtedly been Darfur and Tibet. Many have critised China’s dealing of arms to Sudan and inactivity regarding the crisis in Darfur. This was the root of China’s first Olympic snubbing when director Steven Spielberg withdrew as creative advisor for the Olympics. Speilberg is just one of many influential voices in Hollywood criticizing China on this issue.

More recently, the people of Tibet have decided to seize the opportunity to use the Olympics to bring publicity to their plight. Furious protests have erupted and frantic politicians in Beijing have angrily cast the Dalai Lama as being the orchestrator behind events. The Dalai Lama maintains he does not not condone violence but refuses to criticise the uprising, which has been the first of this magnitude in over twenty years. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, has since challenged Beijing to provide evidence to this claim.

So far the protests in Tibet have been the biggest threat to a smooth Olympics for China. Feelings of previously dormant resentment have bubbled to the surface both home and abroad. Already protests have interrupted the torch lighting ceremony in Greece and even murmurs of boycott have been coming from French president Nicholas Sarkozy among others. China have recently attempted to satisfy international critics by inviting a limited group of previously banned journalists to Tibet. Is it too late to make amends? Either way China is now a country with enough clout not to be regarded out of hand by America, which continues to lend its support to the Olympics.

But taking a more optimistic stance perhaps the IOC was right. The Olympics may possibly be a positive catalyst for change in China. However there is a good chance it will not be the kind of change the autocrats in Beijing had in mind. There is a possibility that the greater international attention and events in Tibet will embolden dissenters. Just as they had in 1989 when thousands of protesters gathered in Tiananmen square.

Desperate to avoid such a possibility, Chinese premier Wen has insisted the Olympics are not about politics.. But the Olympics are, and always will be, about politics. As lovely as may seem, the Olympics is isn’t just about sportsmanship and world peace. If you really think that, I’ve got a lovely piece of sea-front property to sell you in Tibet.

¹http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympics/7233924.stm
²http://www.asianews.it/index.php?art=1919&l=en
http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/02/06/china17986.htm

Thursday, 13 March 2008

Eco- Pirates call it a day.


The Sea Shepherd Society this week has finally decided to end their campaign of sabotage against the Japanese Whaling fleet and it’s flagship the Nisshin Maru. As the season draws to an end, they will be setting new coordinates for another mission aboard their vessel the Steve Irwin. It’s been an emotional month which has seen a deterioration of ties between Japan and Australia, and thanks to the additional efforts of Sea Shepherd, opinions on the matter have become far more polarized than they were at the start of the season. Though as far as Sea Shepard is concerned it was a success, claiming they have prevented the capture of an estimated 500 whales, but to what ends and at what cost?

Tensions have rose to a state of fever pitch on both sides of the whaling debate these previous weeks, with accusations firing back and forth as the violence has escalated. First came attacks with bottles of various chemicals and butter acid being hurled from the Steve Irwin, which then precipitated further action later when the Japan coast guard (which had come in aid of the fleet) was forced to retaliate with non-lethal flash-bangs or stun grenades. Soon after Sea Sheperd leader Paul Watson made to somewhat surprising claim that he was the target of a failed murder attempt by Japanese coast guards. These claims have since adamantly denied by the Japanese government and largely ignored in general.

The skipper of the Steve Irwin Paul Watson is also the founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, a kind of maritime animal liberation front, which formed after Watson split with Greenpeace in the 1970’s on the basis of their non-violent policies. Greenpeace have since been eager to distance themselves from Sea Shepherd who pride themselves on their tally of sunken ships and rarely shy away from putting human lives in danger for the sake of our cetacean friends, earning themselves the label of “eco-terrorists”.

However despite harsh criticism from groups such as their supposed allies Greenpeace, Paul Watson is convinced his mission is just and moral, attempting to evoke, by force, an Australian court order (ruled on the same day) upon Japanese whaling ships acting within the guidelines of international agreements . However the Australian government has also denounced Sea Shepard, with recent calls of condemnation from Foreign Minister Stephan Smith.

In their crusade to push the animal rights agenda forward, Sea Shepherd only seem to have hindered the debate against whaling, undermined international law, undermined Japanese sovereign liberties and isolated the Japanese who, quite rightly, feel they have been unfairly singled out as one of several whaling nations. The negative attention Japan has received has been vastly disproportionate when compared to the inhumanities perpetrated by many other industrial nations on a regular basis (including Australia). Even more disturbingly it has stoked some racist sentiments and attempts to demonise the Japanese. One only needs to browse Facebook to see a whole array of groups bearing titles like “F*ck off Japan” which are peppered with even more racial platitudes on their discussion boards. Yet, oddly enough there has little hue and cry over our european cousins in Norway and their planned whale hunt this year. The quota of which is 1,052 minke whales for the 2008 season. Instead Paul Watson and his crew will go to protest Canadian seal clubbers this month, but I doubt we will here much from the public or media to demonise the Canadians who, unlike the Japanese whalers, only kill for the fur trade.